zlacker

A lot of red meat is probably one angle I can’t get behind. They are very high in cholesterol and triglycerides which are deadly for the heart over the long haul.

>>dyausp+(OP)
Is pretty clear that eating cholesterol doesn't lead to higher blood cholesterol. It just doesn't matter.

>>amanap+48
From ://nutritionfacts.org/video/dietary-guidelines-eat-as-little-dietary-cholesterol-as-possible/

"Most studies regarding cholesterol are bought and paid for by the egg industry. "

>>amanap+48
Its actually not "pretty clear"—about 25-30% of people are hyper responders who are impacted by dietary cholesterol.

>>dyausp+(OP)
The problem is that when people say "red meat" they're almost always referring to the modern "hamburger-like substance" which almost certainly high on the ultra-processed scale.

An actual steak or hamburger ground at a butcher would be a pretty gigantic step up for most people.

>>amanap+48
No, doctors still recommend limiting the intake of cholesterol in food, and also saturated fat. See:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cholesterol#Medical_guidelines...

https://www.heart.org/en/news/2023/08/25/heres-the-latest-on...

>>bsder+ww
Your colon doesn't care how expensive the beef was.

>>bsder+ww
No it’s just the contents of regular red meat. But there’s also a genetic component to it. Some people are more negatively affected than others.

>>addiso+mi
You wouldn’t happen to know the specific genetic markers for this, it’s the only thing I’d like to know about myself so I could eat eggs guilt free. A cursory search keeps giving me not the results I want to see.

>>303uru+sH
The whole thrust of modern nutritional research is to prove that your statement is wrong.

For example, a steak is better than pastrami. This is the point of not eating "ultra-processed" food.

>>amanap+48
One of those Egg Council creeps got to you, too, huh?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuojmEoI51w