zlacker

[parent] [thread] 9 comments
1. stingr+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 12:13:27
But as I understand it they’re still losing money, as much as $0.30 on every ChatGPT query.
replies(1): >>johnsi+p2
2. johnsi+p2[view] [source] 2023-11-20 12:30:34
>>stingr+(OP)
Not true

Sama on X said as of late 2022 they were single digit pennies per query and dropping

replies(3): >>mbrees+63 >>hef198+F3 >>m-p-3+ak
◧◩
3. mbrees+63[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 12:35:28
>>johnsi+p2
New models might have different economics…
◧◩
4. hef198+F3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 12:38:47
>>johnsi+p2
The only financial statements I believe are those signed of by external auditors. And even there my trust only goes that far.
replies(1): >>insani+e5
◧◩◪
5. insani+e5[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 12:49:12
>>hef198+F3
Pretty sure that it would be illegal for them to tweet insider information like that if it were false, since it's effectively a statement to shareholders.
replies(1): >>hef198+u5
◧◩◪◨
6. hef198+u5[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 12:50:23
>>insani+e5
I'll take securities fraud for 420, please, but private.
replies(1): >>insani+W5
◧◩◪◨⬒
7. insani+W5[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 12:52:50
>>hef198+u5
That's exactly the point - by tweeting insider information you are making a public statement. We've learned this very recently...
replies(1): >>hashha+pB
◧◩
8. m-p-3+ak[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 13:58:27
>>johnsi+p2
Still, they must be bleeding money with the humoungous amount of queries they get.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
9. hashha+pB[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 15:00:44
>>insani+W5
Parent meant probably meant that there's no securities fraud since no securities are involved as it's not a traded company.
replies(1): >>insani+sr1
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
10. insani+sr1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 18:44:32
>>hashha+pB
The shareholders are still invested, they still have a 401A Evaluation, and these statements are definitely going to have legal weight.
[go to top]