zlacker

100M users perhaps?

>>fevang+(OP)
But as I understand it they’re still losing money, as much as $0.30 on every ChatGPT query.

>>stingr+P1
Not true

Sama on X said as of late 2022 they were single digit pennies per query and dropping

>>johnsi+e4
New models might have different economics…

>>johnsi+e4
The only financial statements I believe are those signed of by external auditors. And even there my trust only goes that far.

>>hef198+u5
Pretty sure that it would be illegal for them to tweet insider information like that if it were false, since it's effectively a statement to shareholders.

>>insani+37
I'll take securities fraud for 420, please, but private.

>>hef198+j7
That's exactly the point - by tweeting insider information you are making a public statement. We've learned this very recently...

>>johnsi+e4
Still, they must be bleeding money with the humoungous amount of queries they get.

>>insani+L7
Parent meant probably meant that there's no securities fraud since no securities are involved as it's not a traded company.

>>hashha+eD
The shareholders are still invested, they still have a 401A Evaluation, and these statements are definitely going to have legal weight.