zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
8 comments
1. johnsi+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2023-11-20 12:30:34
Not true
Sama on X said as of late 2022 they were single digit pennies per query and dropping
replies(3):
>>mbrees+H
>>hef198+g1
>>m-p-3+Lh
◧
2. mbrees+H
[view]
[source]
2023-11-20 12:35:28
>>johnsi+(OP)
New models might have different economics…
◧
3. hef198+g1
[view]
[source]
2023-11-20 12:38:47
>>johnsi+(OP)
The only financial statements I believe are those signed of by external auditors. And even there my trust only goes that far.
replies(1):
>>insani+P2
◧◩
4. insani+P2
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-20 12:49:12
>>hef198+g1
Pretty sure that it would be illegal for them to tweet insider information like that if it were false, since it's effectively a statement to shareholders.
replies(1):
>>hef198+53
◧◩◪
5. hef198+53
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-20 12:50:23
>>insani+P2
I'll take securities fraud for 420, please, but private.
replies(1):
>>insani+x3
◧◩◪◨
6. insani+x3
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-20 12:52:50
>>hef198+53
That's exactly the point - by tweeting insider information you are making a public statement. We've learned this very recently...
replies(1):
>>hashha+0z
◧
7. m-p-3+Lh
[view]
[source]
2023-11-20 13:58:27
>>johnsi+(OP)
Still, they must be bleeding money with the humoungous amount of queries they get.
◧◩◪◨⬒
8. hashha+0z
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-20 15:00:44
>>insani+x3
Parent meant probably meant that there's no securities fraud since no securities are involved as it's not a traded company.
replies(1):
>>insani+3p1
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
9. insani+3p1
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-20 18:44:32
>>hashha+0z
The shareholders are still invested, they still have a 401A Evaluation, and these statements are definitely going to have legal weight.
[go to top]