zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
4 comments
1. insani+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2023-11-20 12:49:12
Pretty sure that it would be illegal for them to tweet insider information like that if it were false, since it's effectively a statement to shareholders.
replies(1):
>>hef198+g
◧
2. hef198+g
[view]
[source]
2023-11-20 12:50:23
>>insani+(OP)
I'll take securities fraud for 420, please, but private.
replies(1):
>>insani+I
◧◩
3. insani+I
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-20 12:52:50
>>hef198+g
That's exactly the point - by tweeting insider information you are making a public statement. We've learned this very recently...
replies(1):
>>hashha+bw
◧◩◪
4. hashha+bw
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-20 15:00:44
>>insani+I
Parent meant probably meant that there's no securities fraud since no securities are involved as it's not a traded company.
replies(1):
>>insani+em1
◧◩◪◨
5. insani+em1
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-20 18:44:32
>>hashha+bw
The shareholders are still invested, they still have a 401A Evaluation, and these statements are definitely going to have legal weight.
[go to top]