zlacker

[parent] [thread] 90 comments
1. api_or+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-05-31 20:39:42
The reality is that Apollo doesn't serve intrusive ads, and thus, every user using Apollo instead of their own first party apps is lost revenue. Unfortunately, reddit is in that late stage monetization step where they need to prove they are capable of big revenue to justify a high IPO share price.

One can only hope there'll be a watershed moment like the one that killed Digg. So far, reddit has been very careful raising the temperature so as to not scare the frog before it's dead.

replies(14): >>m-p-3+E1 >>superf+g4 >>ProAm+y6 >>robotn+be >>xavdid+Ag >>jamilt+Fg >>kypro+dm >>marcod+wm >>gnt_th+qo >>spyder+Xv >>theogr+Jw >>newscl+JB >>fluidc+ku1 >>x86x87+932
2. m-p-3+E1[view] [source] 2023-05-31 20:47:49
>>api_or+(OP)
in my opinion, a good middle ground would be to make third-party apps only usable if you're subscribed to Reddit Premium.

That way you don't give the data freely, you could make each API keys provided to the user with limits that won't impact normal navigation but would cripple automated data capture, and you'd solve the issue where third-party apps aren't fed ads by sustaining the platform through subscription.

replies(2): >>ceejay+f7 >>zouhai+lA
3. superf+g4[view] [source] 2023-05-31 21:02:49
>>api_or+(OP)
> One can only hope there'll be a watershed moment like the one that killed Digg.

I think a critical part of the Digg exodus was that most people already saw Reddit as a clear #2 in the space. When Digg fucked up, there was an obvious place for everyone to migrate to. I don't see that right now. Facebook isn't cool anymore, Twitter has a large number of people who won't use it because of Elon, Mastodon isn't mature enough to gain casual users.

Bascially, the problem I see is that if people leave reddit, there isn't an obvious place for them to go? TikTok maybe? I just don't see an Pepsi to Reddit's Coke.

replies(7): >>ajmurm+w5 >>tracke+6a >>elpool+xd >>wilson+Ue >>Euphor+Hm >>kkarak+8Y >>doglea+pR1
◧◩
4. ajmurm+w5[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 21:10:05
>>superf+g4
Mh, it feels like there has been little to no innovation and competition between companies about social media that are primarily text-based. Mastodon is in essence a decentralized Twitter. All new social networks seem to be about media other than text. The only text-centric new entry that comes to mind is Substack, but that's not really a social network product. Maybe it's time for a new innovator?
replies(1): >>nkjnlk+Ee
5. ProAm+y6[view] [source] 2023-05-31 21:15:22
>>api_or+(OP)
Why would they IPO? Just take the money you make now and be happy. They need to pay back the VC money they stupidly took very late, but it's not like they need to fund future dev? Another bad redesign? Many people use these alternative apps because the UI on Reddit is pretty bad. They should force ads into the api stream and just call it a day. These 3rd party developers are doing the work for you that the reddit employees cannot figure out on their own.
◧◩
6. ceejay+f7[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 21:20:02
>>m-p-3+E1
I remain shocked this wasn't Musk's approach with Twitter; make API access part of Twitter Blue.
replies(2): >>tracke+S9 >>to11mt+wh
◧◩◪
7. tracke+S9[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 21:34:32
>>ceejay+f7
Considering Twitter Blue isn't ad-free, not that surprised. I'd rather have ad-free paid option than what I get currently with Blue.
replies(1): >>babypu+Pj
◧◩
8. tracke+6a[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 21:36:26
>>superf+g4
Single interest web-bbs systems is a definite option. Can always self-host discourse open-source. There's also many other options, including the Lamernews (HN clone) app.
◧◩
9. elpool+xd[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 21:53:22
>>superf+g4
The key thing reddit has is subreddits. Maybe they could be implemented using BlueSky's custom feeds?
10. robotn+be[view] [source] 2023-05-31 21:56:04
>>api_or+(OP)
Yep, Reddit has reached the enshittification stage as a company
replies(1): >>atraac+e81
◧◩◪
11. nkjnlk+Ee[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 21:58:16
>>ajmurm+w5
seems that text-based social media are not profitable (enough).
◧◩
12. wilson+Ue[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:00:46
>>superf+g4
Discord seems the most likely, it matches the subreddit model and a lot of Reddit communities already have a discord.

Obviously Discord is chat focused so not a one-to-one replacement but I am not sure that the younger generations will care.

Plus there is the possibility of discord adding a Reddit/forum like feature, since they already have the mindshare.

replies(9): >>Etrnl_+fg >>Vexs+Rh >>ctvo+qi >>rhtgrg+ri >>chillf+ql >>SllX+Xm >>superf+dy >>davidc+eu1 >>9935c1+zE9
◧◩◪
13. Etrnl_+fg[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:07:16
>>wilson+Ue
Discord stopped being cool when it started censoring subs for wrongthink, about 4 years ago.
14. xavdid+Ag[view] [source] 2023-05-31 22:09:20
>>api_or+(OP)
> every user using Apollo instead of their own first party apps is lost revenue

That's maybe true as a first-order effect.

But, for the ads that everyone else sees to be worth anything, the site has to be worth visiting at all. If your most dedicated/prolific users mainly post/comment using third party apps, then making their experience worse will reduce the quality of the site overall (even if you start getting revenue on behalf of those dedicated users).

It strikes me as a very shortsighted move.

replies(3): >>packet+Uh >>babypu+4j >>onion2+Ll
15. jamilt+Fg[view] [source] 2023-05-31 22:09:50
>>api_or+(OP)
Is the math that the dev did broadly accurate? If it is, it seems they could safely charge 10-19x less and get more revenue per-user than they do from ads alone... assuming that even a 10x lower cost would be affordable for third-party clients, which isn't a given.
replies(1): >>aemble+Xh
◧◩◪
16. to11mt+wh[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:14:53
>>ceejay+f7
My guess is that keeping API access behind a paywall is a money maker for a few specific client sets; the ones that immediately come to mind are Trading Companies (both traditional and crypto,) marketing companies (analyze trends/etc,) as well as large orgs with some form of reputation to uphold (i.e. large enough where just one person manning the account is not feasible.)
replies(1): >>ceejay+Iy
◧◩◪
17. Vexs+Rh[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:16:18
>>wilson+Ue
Please god no. So much info is already getting dumped to discord and nowhere else making searching or archiving impossible, we don't need more of that.
replies(3): >>Nathan+uj >>edande+ir >>always+9e1
◧◩
18. packet+Uh[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:16:30
>>xavdid+Ag
Short-sighted is presumably what they want: pump and dump onto the public market so early investors and founders get their payday and ride off into the sunset on bags of money while "the market" eats the losses and the slow (or maybe fast and painful) demise carries on for the next 3-10 years.
◧◩
19. aemble+Xh[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:16:55
>>jamilt+Fg
Those users might be worth 10x as much as the average user though.
replies(1): >>solark+Tq
◧◩◪
20. ctvo+qi[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:19:15
>>wilson+Ue
> Discord seems the most likely

Reddit is about discovering content. How would you discover anything on Discord? Is there a trending list to see the top messages? Is there a way to list Discord communities so you can discover ones matching your interest?

I'm at a lost to how the two are similar in any way except for the "young generations" use them both.

replies(2): >>witche+nj >>teolan+Xl
◧◩◪
21. rhtgrg+ri[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:19:26
>>wilson+Ue
Discord already has forums.

https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/6208479917079-...

replies(1): >>moffka+Qr
◧◩
22. babypu+4j[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:24:26
>>xavdid+Ag
This is exactly what we've seen on Twitter. The already low bar for quality took a nosedive once they started ruining blue checkmarks and banning third party apps.

Twitter still maintains a critical mass of users and corporate accounts, but all the most talented creators (at least the ones I followed) have reduced their Twitter usage substantially or moved on completely.

Eventually new readers will stop showing up because there is no worthwhile content.

replies(1): >>crimso+wu
◧◩◪◨
23. witche+nj[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:26:09
>>ctvo+qi
I doubt anyone actually used the front page to discover things, most likely they will stick to a handful of subreddits.
replies(4): >>nagyf+fp >>moffka+Fr >>ctvo+Zs >>pokerf+8A3
◧◩◪◨
24. Nathan+uj[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:26:57
>>Vexs+Rh
that's part of the appeal nowadays, it seems websites and apps don't see the point of making themselves freely searchable anymore
◧◩◪◨
25. babypu+Pj[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:28:42
>>tracke+S9
What even is the point of Blue?

We already know that the "verification" it provides is functionally worthless.

These days it seems like anyone with a blue checkmark is just asking to get made fun of.

replies(3): >>bmarqu+Em >>hombre+tx >>tracke+n26
◧◩◪
26. chillf+ql[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:38:27
>>wilson+Ue
Discord already has a forum feature, it’s just rarely used.
◧◩
27. onion2+Ll[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:39:43
>>xavdid+Ag
If your most dedicated/prolific users mainly post/comment using third party apps...

Thats really easy for Reddit to measure. Why are you assuming they haven't?

It strikes me as a very shortsighted move.

If you stop assuming that Reddit is run by idiots, and you consider the likely probability that they've modelled this stuff in some depth, it's easy to believe that your initial assumption is wrong, and that the users are on 1st party apps (or will be if others shut down), and that many will stay and continue to post rather than leave or stop posting.

Your premise is based wholly on the belief that you know more about Reddit users than Reddit does. That seems dubious to me.

replies(5): >>loktar+um >>nitwit+ko >>Cheeze+zq >>zouhai+2A >>lmm+oT
◧◩◪◨
28. teolan+Xl[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:40:38
>>ctvo+qi
You can search for public servers in the Discord app by keyword, but not for specific posts across all servers. It's more comparable to Reddit but without the frontpage, or structured posts.
replies(1): >>dvngnt+Nv
29. kypro+dm[view] [source] 2023-05-31 22:41:36
>>api_or+(OP)
> every user using Apollo instead of their own first party apps is lost revenue.

This isn't true if they're charging for API access. At best it's a question of whether the lost ad revenue is being compensated for by API revenue.

If you want to attribute an ulterior motive here I'm guessing it's more about control. They want their users to use Reddit as they want them to use Reddit, or at least they'd like to reserve the right to that power.

replies(1): >>lldb+cn
◧◩◪
30. loktar+um[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:43:50
>>onion2+Ll
There's another possibility - they have measured it, and have assumed the draw to Reddit will be stronger than their ties to the third-party apps.
31. marcod+wm[view] [source] 2023-05-31 22:43:59
>>api_or+(OP)
I was just thinking of how when Digg died, Reddit was there for us. Onto the next best thing!
◧◩◪◨⬒
32. bmarqu+Em[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:45:02
>>babypu+Pj
Blue seems to be a "less likely to be a bot" badge.

Considering that I've seen ChatGPT-type comments in various subreddits, I expect paid social media like Twitter Blue, Reddit Premium and Discord Nitro being pushed even more in the future.

replies(1): >>ceejay+Ko
◧◩
33. Euphor+Hm[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:45:22
>>superf+g4
Reddit is just a backend to apolo, if they make their own backend, a lot of people would switch.
replies(2): >>superf+uw >>nptelj+9O1
◧◩◪
34. SllX+Xm[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:47:00
>>wilson+Ue
Discord ties together Reddit, YouTube, Twitch and other web communities too: podcasts, webcomics, Patreon.

Only issue I’m having with it is discoverability of new communities.

◧◩
35. lldb+cn[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:48:21
>>kypro+dm
I think I saw somewhere the average user generates $0.12/month in ad revenue for Reddit. The proposed API rate is over 10x that.
◧◩◪
36. nitwit+ko[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:54:36
>>onion2+Ll
Customers knowing more about the effects of decisions than the actual decision makers at a company is fairly normal. There is a reason they send out all those surveys. They're hoping you'll let them know about their mistakes.
replies(2): >>tornat+Mw >>jdgoes+qA
37. gnt_th+qo[view] [source] 2023-05-31 22:55:18
>>api_or+(OP)
>The reality is that Apollo doesn't serve intrusive ads

Because they aren't having to pay for hosting.

The only way to replace reddit is with a distributed system like aether: https://getaether.net/

Or if you absolutely want a centralized system, something community run like ao3: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archive_of_Our_Own

But given the absolute hostility and hate _users_ of reddit give those two sites for not banning everything they find offensive a site like reddit is just not possible any more.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
38. ceejay+Ko[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:56:32
>>bmarqu+Em
> Blue seems to be a "less likely to be a bot" badge.

It's not working. https://imgur.com/a/6blpTqF

replies(1): >>babypu+uu
◧◩◪◨⬒
39. nagyf+fp[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:58:52
>>witche+nj
I use the "Home" and the "Popular" tabs every day to discover things on reddit. I can't be alone with this
replies(1): >>zeven7+k01
◧◩◪
40. Cheeze+zq[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 23:06:37
>>onion2+Ll
>Your premise is based wholly on the belief that you know more about Reddit users than Reddit does. That seems dubious to me.

I know that their UI and native application are absolutely bullshit.

replies(2): >>girfan+YI >>onion2+g11
◧◩◪
41. solark+Tq[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 23:08:49
>>aemble+Xh
They're heavy users, but something tells me that they're also likely to block ads.
replies(1): >>noitpm+OF
◧◩◪◨
42. edande+ir[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 23:12:22
>>Vexs+Rh
This is a selling point of Discord. The ability to have a conversation without "researchers" being able to search for it for decades.
replies(3): >>OrvalW+Yz >>Cursed+VV >>lost_t+9W
◧◩◪◨⬒
43. moffka+Fr[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 23:14:35
>>witche+nj
There are dozens of us.
◧◩◪◨
44. moffka+Qr[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 23:15:44
>>rhtgrg+ri
Tbf Discord forums are so catastrophically badly designed in terms of UI that they're pretty much unusable.

Ultimately if you want good discussion you need the same layout that Reddit and HN have, with indented comments and easily branching chains. Otherwise it's just a chat masquerading as a forum thread which is useless.

replies(2): >>witche+5w >>lost_t+eW
◧◩◪◨⬒
45. ctvo+Zs[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 23:23:24
>>witche+nj
My partner scrolls through the popular section nightly reading interesting things and chuckling at memes. I think you're out of touch with how many people use Reddit in this casual, low investment way.
replies(1): >>mdale+QJ
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
46. babypu+uu[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 23:34:56
>>ceejay+Ko
Bots ponying up for the gold checkmark.

Man what a disaster Twitter has turned into.

◧◩◪
47. crimso+wu[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 23:35:25
>>babypu+4j
I haven’t used twitter since they blocked access to 3rd party apps. Twitter, Reddit and HN are sites I really only use on my mobile through 3rd party apps along with Omnivore to save interesting articles to read later.

For me, Reddit and Twitter are simply not worth visiting using mobile web or first party apps because the ratio of crap I don’t want to see (ads and promoted content) is too high vs the content I came to see.

YouTube is going the same way, I use multiple adblock rules to hide “shorts”, “people also searched for”, and “people also watched”. I pay for YouTube premium but feel like a mug for paying for a service which tries to force feed me content I don’t want. I’m on the brink of cancelling the subscription.

◧◩◪◨⬒
48. dvngnt+Nv[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 23:44:34
>>teolan+Xl
i'd argue it's closer to slack than reddit
49. spyder+Xv[view] [source] 2023-05-31 23:45:49
>>api_or+(OP)
Even without ads the users that post content (or manage their subreddit) through third-party apps are still valuable for Reddit. Sure they are a smaller percentage, but that small percentage is more valuable than a regular ad watching user.
◧◩◪◨⬒
50. witche+5w[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 23:46:49
>>moffka+Qr
The best UI would probably be a mixture of a forum and reddit. A fourm is a much superior model because it lacks upvotes/downvotes and is chronologically ordered, but lacks branching and chains that you describe. Reddit currently is being used more similarly to the forum culture than anything else.
◧◩◪
51. superf+uw[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 23:49:31
>>Euphor+Hm
I actually brought up this same idea elsewhere in this thread. Apparently, Apollo is a single developer though, so the main problem I see with this is time. Reddit switches over to new pricing July 1st, so this one person would have a single month to build out a new backend that would need to support tens of thousands of users and I just don't see that happening even if we assume they can hire a team of contractors and scaled it down to just core features.
replies(2): >>willis+1E >>fluidc+mv1
52. theogr+Jw[view] [source] 2023-05-31 23:50:59
>>api_or+(OP)
I moved to Apollo a month ago and paid for Pro because the Reddit app kept feeding me the same ad over and over, and it was a really annoying ad at that. Nothing I did including reporting it using various labels / downvoting it would remove it completely from my stream.

I will not be using the Reddit app unless they do something about annoying / intrusive ads on their app.

I'm fine with ads, just stop showing the ones to me I don't want to keep seeing.

replies(1): >>xenoli+sw2
◧◩◪◨
53. tornat+Mw[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 23:51:30
>>nitwit+ko
Some evidence to support your decision: The CEO of Reddit hasn't posted or commented on Reddit in almost a year. Same goes with most of the decision-makers. They're not users of their own product.
replies(1): >>pclark+Ux
◧◩◪◨⬒
54. hombre+tx[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 23:58:10
>>babypu+Pj
Longer tweets + edit button seem like decent features for power users though not for the average lurker. Yet it seems like half of the reply guys have the blue badge.
◧◩◪◨⬒
55. pclark+Ux[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 00:03:14
>>tornat+Mw
he obviously has an alt, like cmon
◧◩◪
56. superf+dy[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 00:05:57
>>wilson+Ue
I disagree. A lot of other people are pointing out the discoverability problem (which I agree is an issue), but I think the medium just isn't comparable.

Chat is ephemeral and it there's a certain amount of participation expected, where as Reddit content strikes a nice balance of changing frequently, but not instantaneous and, for most users, it's a passive activity. To put it another way, most people aren't doom-scrolling on a discord server.

replies(2): >>hnick+nM >>milkyt+QJ3
◧◩◪◨
57. ceejay+Iy[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 00:11:11
>>to11mt+wh
Firehose access has been behind a paid wall for about a decade now (initially via Gnip, which they acquired). You'd have rate limits on Twitter Blue API access intended to support normal single-user activity.
◧◩◪◨⬒
58. OrvalW+Yz[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 00:23:32
>>edande+ir
For many of us, Discord’s model is an anti-pattern.

Try searching for something when you don’t recall where you said it (dc server or DM)

replies(1): >>None4U+kog
◧◩◪
59. zouhai+2A[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 00:24:08
>>onion2+Ll
> Thats really easy for Reddit to measure. Why are you assuming they haven't?

It's a well know historical fact that companies always do the smart move only based on hard facts.

◧◩
60. zouhai+lA[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 00:26:57
>>m-p-3+E1
I am paying too many subscriptions to care. I'll just stop using Reddit on mobile, most kids are on TikTok anyway.

So they are just alienating younger users.

◧◩◪◨
61. jdgoes+qA[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 00:27:56
>>nitwit+ko
I’m not sure how anyone works in the tech industry for any amount of time and comes away with the impression that large company execs regularly make good product decisions. It’s especially funny to claim this for a company like Reddit that has a very public history of awful decisions.
62. newscl+JB[view] [source] 2023-06-01 00:41:07
>>api_or+(OP)
"One can only hope there'll be a watershed moment like the one that killed Digg" To burn capital on another platform before the next exodus?

We need to figure out sustainable online communities.

◧◩◪◨
63. willis+1E[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 01:06:39
>>superf+uw
Judging from this thread: I bet the Apollo dev could easily secure enough VC to eat reddit's lunch in short order. There would be no shortage of talent willing to take down goliath.
replies(1): >>tayo42+zI
◧◩◪◨
64. noitpm+OF[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 01:23:44
>>solark+Tq
I think it's more about the fact that the users are paying for the service. The % of reddit's userbase that has enough disposable income to subscribe is a very very very high value slice for advertisers.
◧◩◪◨⬒
65. tayo42+zI[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 02:01:18
>>willis+1E
How many of us are unemployed or underemployed after getting laid off. I got nothing going on hah.

Pick me, I'll build and scale your social media site. I already did it once too hah

◧◩◪◨
66. girfan+YI[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 02:04:30
>>Cheeze+zq
Even if that is the case, it does not say much about their ability to evaluate what category of users (e.g., those coming from Apollo or their first-party clients) is generating more views/interactions and indirectly more "value" on their platform.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
67. mdale+QJ[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 02:13:38
>>ctvo+Zs
They still need the content creators to create :) which I think they have done a good job of at least creating FOMO of top posts gathering monitory props.
◧◩◪◨
68. hnick+nM[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 02:42:28
>>superf+dy
It's also linear. Reddit has hierarchical reply/conversation trees. Even Facebook has that to some degree. Discord doesn't.
◧◩◪
69. lmm+oT[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 04:05:49
>>onion2+Ll
Historically when a large organisation does something that looks really dumb, it's usually exactly as dumb as it looks. I'd expect most individuals to make better decisions about Reddit than Reddit does, because of the whole "the intelligence of a group is that of its dumbest member divided by the square root of the number of people in it" effect.
◧◩◪◨⬒
70. Cursed+VV[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 04:37:08
>>edande+ir
Doesn't Discord keep the data forever? And potentially sell it to "researchers"?
◧◩◪◨⬒
71. lost_t+9W[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 04:41:06
>>edande+ir
Discord no doubt keeps every conversation ever typed on their servers. they might toss out something huge like a movie file but text compresses -very- well.
◧◩◪◨⬒
72. lost_t+eW[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 04:42:20
>>moffka+Qr
they could be made better though if reddit's death seems imminent because of a beancounter incursion.
◧◩
73. kkarak+8Y[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 05:07:18
>>superf+g4
honestly i've been on tiktok/instagram since the pandemic, text forums don't have the same appeal as instantly making a video reply and seeing people react to it. i don't visit reddit/other forums as much anymore - the bot replies and quality of user are super annoying now.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
74. zeven7+k01[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 05:34:36
>>nagyf+fp
I use /r/all exclusively. I have an account and subscribe to subreddits, but I never go to the home screen. I do check some subreddits directly. Otherwise just /r/all.
◧◩◪◨
75. onion2+g11[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 05:51:44
>>Cheeze+zq
Sure, but something very important to remember in software is that users will put up with endless bullshit if the app is solving a problem for them. I could point out hundreds of apps that are absolute garbage that I've happily used because no matter how bad they are they're better than not using them. Reddit's apps don't need to be good if users derive enough value (fun, joy, karma, access to porn, whatever) from using Reddit despite the UI.

Something that so many founders get wrong is the belief that something needs to be good to be valuable. It doesn't. It just needs to be better than not having it. That is often a tremendously low bar.

◧◩
76. atraac+e81[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 07:18:55
>>robotn+be
Pretty sure they reached that stage long time ago when they redesigned their UI into an unusable, slow mess of an interface that noone asked for.
replies(1): >>robotn+sC3
◧◩◪◨
77. always+9e1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 08:31:37
>>Vexs+Rh
Sending something to discord is like sending it to /dev/null except that it is also diverted into the mailbox of Big Brother, with you having only very limited access to it on their whim.
◧◩◪
78. davidc+eu1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 11:28:08
>>wilson+Ue
I hope this is not the case. In my experience, Discord has always been clunky, very slow, and truly unmanageable (from a user’s perspective).
79. fluidc+ku1[view] [source] 2023-06-01 11:28:50
>>api_or+(OP)
Of course, the flip side to that is that I would assume TikTok and Instagram or Twitter type content is not as valuable for LLM training. I think it's the big long form posts that you get on Reddit with explanations and tutorials and advice that have value.

And I don't think a lot of that value has much to do with the direction Reddit has been going with its redesign. If they viewed their core product as creating high quality rich textual content for input into LLM, they would do many, many things differently and probably spend more time improving the moderator tools to improve curation.

◧◩◪◨
80. fluidc+mv1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 11:38:12
>>superf+uw
All the other mobile cliets could switch to a compatible backend API as well. Apollo is only an iOS client. There are a number of Android and ross-platform clients as well. Such as RedditIsFun or Baconreader or Infinity. What would be missing is a web frontend.
◧◩◪
81. nptelj+9O1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 13:49:06
>>Euphor+Hm
Now while that's nice, who's going to pay for that? Certainly not Apollo / other third party reddit users. And so, at most you'd get a honeymoon period out of this, while burning someone else's money, until they get fed up, and monetize or close the service. Similar to what happened to Imgur.
◧◩
82. doglea+pR1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 14:05:10
>>superf+g4
It’s already moving to discord.

Discord blows for asynchronous conversations. But that doesn’t mean it’s not the replacement.

83. x86x87+932[view] [source] 2023-06-01 14:55:44
>>api_or+(OP)
a few options for Reddit: 1/ just buy Apollo. show ads 2/ do a special deal with Apollo where they somehow incorporate ads into the app 3/ API access with Reddit Premium. Apollo can now carry on as normal for premium users & charges "free" users 4/ learn to build a freaking app - people didn't end up using Apollo because of the high quality of the Reddit mobile app.

Personally I rarely use Reddit in a browser and if 3rd party apps were to go away that would be the end of Reddit for me.

replies(1): >>jimmyS+Dq2
◧◩
84. jimmyS+Dq2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 16:18:37
>>x86x87+932
Yes. I like that idea about API keys like how OpenAI is doing it so the user can plug in their billing account into whatever 3rd Party service you find interesting (and may have a totally separate financial relationship with) so the user is basically paying Reddit. They could possibly implement this already as users connect their accounts to the app when it's setup. At the end of the day its the same thing Reddit is being compensated for off site data access but somehow it feels more organic and under my control as a user vs this kind of rent seeking ransom negotiations for a hostage user base.
◧◩
85. xenoli+sw2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 16:40:36
>>theogr+Jw
I know exactly which ad you're talking about, and it's STILL around in my feed when I access via the web.
◧◩◪◨⬒
86. pokerf+8A3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 21:45:51
>>witche+nj
the vast majority of reddit users today do not do anything beyond scroll through default subreddits and the front page, people who curate their own experience to ONLY be what they selected are an extreme minority.
◧◩◪
87. robotn+sC3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 21:57:04
>>atraac+e81
True. I guess it started around 2015 then.
◧◩◪◨
88. milkyt+QJ3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 22:39:42
>>superf+dy
This, and also that chat platforms don't really have a crowd voting system. The thing I like about HN is that people can vote on content to have it promoted or demoted. Obviously this has its own issues, but I'm not aware of any big social platforms that do this. Twitter kind of does, but it functions a bit different.
◧◩◪◨⬒
89. tracke+n26[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-02 16:28:17
>>babypu+Pj
Main thing is supporting the platform. Second is the longer posts without having to do split threads. I think the "edit" implementation and the delayed posting is very broken to say the least.

As to making fun of someone willing to pay to support a given system, I'm not sure that's at all productive. At that point, should probably not even be using said system in the first place. That doesn't mean I agree with every decision, or every direction, but do find it's a bit better than before overall.

◧◩◪
90. 9935c1+zE9[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-03 22:30:02
>>wilson+Ue
Absolutely not. Discords UX is a hot mess for its intended use case, absolutely no way it is good enough to flex to being a Reddit.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
91. None4U+kog[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-06 01:47:37
>>OrvalW+Yz
Search the .CSVs yourself?
[go to top]