zlacker

[return to "Had a call with Reddit to discuss pricing"]
1. api_or+vL[view] [source] 2023-05-31 20:39:42
>>robbie+(OP)
The reality is that Apollo doesn't serve intrusive ads, and thus, every user using Apollo instead of their own first party apps is lost revenue. Unfortunately, reddit is in that late stage monetization step where they need to prove they are capable of big revenue to justify a high IPO share price.

One can only hope there'll be a watershed moment like the one that killed Digg. So far, reddit has been very careful raising the temperature so as to not scare the frog before it's dead.

◧◩
2. m-p-3+9N[view] [source] 2023-05-31 20:47:49
>>api_or+vL
in my opinion, a good middle ground would be to make third-party apps only usable if you're subscribed to Reddit Premium.

That way you don't give the data freely, you could make each API keys provided to the user with limits that won't impact normal navigation but would cripple automated data capture, and you'd solve the issue where third-party apps aren't fed ads by sustaining the platform through subscription.

◧◩◪
3. ceejay+KS[view] [source] 2023-05-31 21:20:02
>>m-p-3+9N
I remain shocked this wasn't Musk's approach with Twitter; make API access part of Twitter Blue.
◧◩◪◨
4. to11mt+131[view] [source] 2023-05-31 22:14:53
>>ceejay+KS
My guess is that keeping API access behind a paywall is a money maker for a few specific client sets; the ones that immediately come to mind are Trading Companies (both traditional and crypto,) marketing companies (analyze trends/etc,) as well as large orgs with some form of reputation to uphold (i.e. large enough where just one person manning the account is not feasible.)
[go to top]