zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. pc86+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-13 20:34:01
Eyeballs increase ad revenue, just because you're not paying money doesn't mean the artist isn't making money.
replies(1): >>retsib+Xc1
2. retsib+Xc1[view] [source] 2026-01-14 03:54:53
>>pc86+(OP)
> Eyeballs increase ad revenue

If you're blocking ads, I think this is usually false. (But I would appreciate a correction if I'm wrong, or more detail if it's complicated.)

replies(3): >>Kepler+8B1 >>shiroi+Wh5 >>pc86+kA6
◧◩
3. Kepler+8B1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-14 08:26:23
>>retsib+Xc1
You still increase their algorithmic reach by viewing and interacting with their content. It really is voting with your eyeballs: whether you like or hate the content, if you have it on your screen, the creators benefit.
◧◩
4. shiroi+Wh5[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-15 03:58:21
>>retsib+Xc1
I disagree: network effects are still present even if you block ads. You tell your friends about it, they tell their friends, etc. Only a small fraction of people bother to block ads (or even know about ad-blocking), so the loss in ad revenue to those people is offset by the gain from their friends seeing the ads.
◧◩
5. pc86+kA6[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-15 14:15:18
>>retsib+Xc1
In addition to the two replies below, which are both accurate, most people don't block any ads.
[go to top]