zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. microm+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-08 16:08:07
you've got to find better sources than a health coach selling a subscription program that benefits from this take, that post is indistinguishable from spam

red meat and colorectal cancer https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4698595/

> As a summary, it seems that red and processed meats significantly but moderately increase CRC risk by 20-30% according to these meta-analyses.

red meat cardiovascular disease, and diabetes: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37264855/

> Unprocessed and processed red meat consumption are both associated with higher risk of CVD, CVD subtypes, and diabetes, with a stronger association in western settings but no sex difference.

replies(1): >>nradov+3q
2. nradov+3q[view] [source] 2026-01-08 18:02:59
>>microm+(OP)
So more low-quality, poorly controlled junk science. If you want anyone to take you seriously then you'll have to do better than that.
replies(2): >>microm+lz >>jf22+Ix3
◧◩
3. microm+lz[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-08 18:47:30
>>nradov+3q
You literally provided nothing but spam behind a subscription gate. I provided peer reviewed meta-analyses.
◧◩
4. jf22+Ix3[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-09 17:20:27
>>nradov+3q
Do you agree or disagree you provided a link to a fitness influencer's website as "evidence?"
[go to top]