zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. nradov+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-08 18:02:59
So more low-quality, poorly controlled junk science. If you want anyone to take you seriously then you'll have to do better than that.
replies(2): >>microm+i9 >>jf22+F73
2. microm+i9[view] [source] 2026-01-08 18:47:30
>>nradov+(OP)
You literally provided nothing but spam behind a subscription gate. I provided peer reviewed meta-analyses.
3. jf22+F73[view] [source] 2026-01-09 17:20:27
>>nradov+(OP)
Do you agree or disagree you provided a link to a fitness influencer's website as "evidence?"
[go to top]