zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
2 comments
1. nradov+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2026-01-08 18:02:59
So more low-quality, poorly controlled junk science. If you want anyone to take you seriously then you'll have to do better than that.
replies(2):
>>microm+i9
>>jf22+F73
◧
2. microm+i9
[view]
[source]
2026-01-08 18:47:30
>>nradov+(OP)
You literally provided nothing but spam behind a subscription gate. I provided peer reviewed meta-analyses.
◧
3. jf22+F73
[view]
[source]
2026-01-09 17:20:27
>>nradov+(OP)
Do you agree or disagree you provided a link to a fitness influencer's website as "evidence?"
[go to top]