zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. nradov+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-08 15:31:22
What are the "well known health issues"? I have seen some low-quality observational studies (junk science) which show some weak correlation between consumption of animal products and negative health outcomes but so far nothing conclusive one way or the other.

https://peterattiamd.com/high-protein-diets-and-cancer-risk/

replies(1): >>microm+z7
2. microm+z7[view] [source] 2026-01-08 16:08:07
>>nradov+(OP)
you've got to find better sources than a health coach selling a subscription program that benefits from this take, that post is indistinguishable from spam

red meat and colorectal cancer https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4698595/

> As a summary, it seems that red and processed meats significantly but moderately increase CRC risk by 20-30% according to these meta-analyses.

red meat cardiovascular disease, and diabetes: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37264855/

> Unprocessed and processed red meat consumption are both associated with higher risk of CVD, CVD subtypes, and diabetes, with a stronger association in western settings but no sex difference.

replies(1): >>nradov+Cx
◧◩
3. nradov+Cx[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-08 18:02:59
>>microm+z7
So more low-quality, poorly controlled junk science. If you want anyone to take you seriously then you'll have to do better than that.
replies(2): >>microm+UG >>jf22+hF3
◧◩◪
4. microm+UG[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-08 18:47:30
>>nradov+Cx
You literally provided nothing but spam behind a subscription gate. I provided peer reviewed meta-analyses.
◧◩◪
5. jf22+hF3[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-09 17:20:27
>>nradov+Cx
Do you agree or disagree you provided a link to a fitness influencer's website as "evidence?"
[go to top]