zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. maxloh+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-22 11:59:50
Maybe the new in-development Carbon language? It sounds promising, but it is nowhere near its 1.0 release.
replies(1): >>maskli+72
2. maskli+72[view] [source] 2025-08-22 12:16:45
>>maxloh+(OP)
Carbon exists only for interoperating with and transitioning off of C++. Creating a new code base in carbon doesn’t really make sense, and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that.
replies(1): >>maxloh+v5
◧◩
3. maxloh+v5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-22 12:35:07
>>maskli+72
> ... and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that.

Could you quote which paragraph you're talking about?

AFAIK, interoperability with C++ code is just one of their explicit goals; they only place that as the last item in the "Language Goals" section.

replies(1): >>maskli+of
◧◩◪
4. maskli+of[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-22 13:26:17
>>maxloh+v5
> Existing modern languages already provide an excellent developer experience: Go, Swift, Kotlin, Rust, and many more. Developers that can use one of these existing languages should.
[go to top]