zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. jonath+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-22 11:48:22
Oh no , Rust is too tough, go is no good, am i going back to java?
replies(2): >>maxloh+C1 >>pjmlp+t5
2. maxloh+C1[view] [source] 2025-08-22 11:59:50
>>jonath+(OP)
Maybe the new in-development Carbon language? It sounds promising, but it is nowhere near its 1.0 release.
replies(1): >>maskli+J3
◧◩
3. maskli+J3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-22 12:16:45
>>maxloh+C1
Carbon exists only for interoperating with and transitioning off of C++. Creating a new code base in carbon doesn’t really make sense, and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that.
replies(1): >>maxloh+77
4. pjmlp+t5[view] [source] 2025-08-22 12:27:00
>>jonath+(OP)
So many options in-between.
◧◩◪
5. maxloh+77[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-22 12:35:07
>>maskli+J3
> ... and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that.

Could you quote which paragraph you're talking about?

AFAIK, interoperability with C++ code is just one of their explicit goals; they only place that as the last item in the "Language Goals" section.

replies(1): >>maskli+0h
◧◩◪◨
6. maskli+0h[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-22 13:26:17
>>maxloh+77
> Existing modern languages already provide an excellent developer experience: Go, Swift, Kotlin, Rust, and many more. Developers that can use one of these existing languages should.
[go to top]