zlacker

>>ustad+(OP)
Oh no , Rust is too tough, go is no good, am i going back to java?

>>jonath+Ud
Maybe the new in-development Carbon language? It sounds promising, but it is nowhere near its 1.0 release.

>>maxloh+wf
Carbon exists only for interoperating with and transitioning off of C++. Creating a new code base in carbon doesn’t really make sense, and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that.

>>maskli+Dh
> ... and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that.

Could you quote which paragraph you're talking about?

AFAIK, interoperability with C++ code is just one of their explicit goals; they only place that as the last item in the "Language Goals" section.