zlacker

And here he is arriving at an event with a dress code.

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2023/05/04/multimedia/04even...

Another event, another dress code.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQfQwah...

Edit: removed extraneous arguments. Point here is that Pichai observes event-specific dress codes rather than assuming that Google’s code applies.

>>robotr+(OP)
What's your point? I'm not suggesting that Sundar ALWAYS wears jeans and NEVER wears suits.

I'm saying that it is ACCEPTABLE to wear jeans, even in a professional setting. Jeans are "smart business attire." (If the dress code were "formal," that would be something else. But it isn't.)

>>hilux+I
I work at Google. I would not describe Google’s dress code as “smart business attire”.

>>hilux+I
Jeans are not smart business attire. Google’s code is casual, not smart business.

>>hilux+I
What's your point? If you find a photo of Larry Page in pajamas then you should be able to wear that to any Google event?

>>searea+k1
Does Larry Page regularly do business events in pajamas?

>>searea+k1
The point is that Pichai observes the dress code requested by the event host.

Did I make it so obscurely?

>>searea+k1
Yes, obviously.

>>robotr+k2
To counter, the dress code was vague and imprecise. See my other comment here- >>42528218

EDIT: Actually, the poster above was not accurate. The dress code is found here- https://www.fide.com/docs/regulations/wrbc_regulations_2024_...

And it was much more precise than "smart business attire.".

>>robotr+k2
I was not responding to you.

>>ensign+o3
Nope. It explicitly disallowed jeans.

>>searea+s3
You are correct, I have edited my comment.