zlacker

>>throwu+(OP)
The dress code calls for "smart business attire."

The title sponsor is Google, a well-known tech company.

Here's Google CEO Sundar Pichai in GQ: https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/lifestyle/article/sundar-picha...

>>hilux+c5
And here he is arriving at an event with a dress code.

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2023/05/04/multimedia/04even...

Another event, another dress code.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQfQwah...

Edit: removed extraneous arguments. Point here is that Pichai observes event-specific dress codes rather than assuming that Google’s code applies.

>>robotr+n7
What's your point? I'm not suggesting that Sundar ALWAYS wears jeans and NEVER wears suits.

I'm saying that it is ACCEPTABLE to wear jeans, even in a professional setting. Jeans are "smart business attire." (If the dress code were "formal," that would be something else. But it isn't.)

>>hilux+58
What's your point? If you find a photo of Larry Page in pajamas then you should be able to wear that to any Google event?

>>searea+H8
The point is that Pichai observes the dress code requested by the event host.

Did I make it so obscurely?

>>robotr+H9
To counter, the dress code was vague and imprecise. See my other comment here- >>42528218

EDIT: Actually, the poster above was not accurate. The dress code is found here- https://www.fide.com/docs/regulations/wrbc_regulations_2024_...

And it was much more precise than "smart business attire.".

>>ensign+La
Nope. It explicitly disallowed jeans.