zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. searea+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-12-28 02:39:35
What's your point? If you find a photo of Larry Page in pajamas then you should be able to wear that to any Google event?
replies(3): >>hilux+l >>robotr+01 >>dullcr+a1
2. hilux+l[view] [source] 2024-12-28 02:42:34
>>searea+(OP)
Does Larry Page regularly do business events in pajamas?
3. robotr+01[view] [source] 2024-12-28 02:50:51
>>searea+(OP)
The point is that Pichai observes the dress code requested by the event host.

Did I make it so obscurely?

replies(2): >>ensign+42 >>searea+52
4. dullcr+a1[view] [source] 2024-12-28 02:53:53
>>searea+(OP)
Yes, obviously.
◧◩
5. ensign+42[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-28 03:08:00
>>robotr+01
To counter, the dress code was vague and imprecise. See my other comment here- >>42528218

EDIT: Actually, the poster above was not accurate. The dress code is found here- https://www.fide.com/docs/regulations/wrbc_regulations_2024_...

And it was much more precise than "smart business attire.".

replies(1): >>searea+82
◧◩
6. searea+52[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-28 03:08:24
>>robotr+01
I was not responding to you.
◧◩◪
7. searea+82[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-28 03:08:46
>>ensign+42
Nope. It explicitly disallowed jeans.
replies(1): >>ensign+43
◧◩◪◨
8. ensign+43[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-28 03:22:18
>>searea+82
You are correct, I have edited my comment.
[go to top]