zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. kelnos+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-12-04 22:49:30
I think GP meant that stigmatizing the idea of a coomer is regressive and shaming, in that it's sex-negative -- if someone wants to masturbate excessively, there's nothing wrong with that, as long as it's not negatively impacting other aspects of their life. Not sure I agree with that take, but I think that's what they were talking about.
replies(1): >>aprilt+Hu
2. aprilt+Hu[view] [source] 2024-12-05 03:59:05
>>kelnos+(OP)
But there is something wrong with that. The excessive part. Thanks for clarifying
replies(1): >>selcuk+xH
◧◩
3. selcuk+xH[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-05 06:42:00
>>aprilt+Hu
Do we have regressive and shaming names for excessive water drinkers? Excessive breathers? Excessive readers?
replies(2): >>defros+LI >>aprilt+7B4
◧◩◪
4. defros+LI[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-05 06:56:56
>>selcuk+xH
No, no, and yes.

There are few, if any, shuttering themselves away from regular social interactions due to an addiction to water or air.

The appearence of doing so because of a porn or more general book compulsion is more commonn.

replies(1): >>selcuk+Fh1
◧◩◪◨
5. selcuk+Fh1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-05 13:09:17
>>defros+LI
So what's the regressive and shaming name for excessive readers?
replies(1): >>defros+hi1
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. defros+hi1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-05 13:13:46
>>selcuk+Fh1
Aside from four eyed bookworm et al you mean?
◧◩◪
7. aprilt+7B4[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-06 15:21:47
>>selcuk+xH
Those aren't common things to be. We have regressive and shaming names for the excessively wealthy, the excessively macho, the excessively progressive, etc.

All things in moderation.

[go to top]