zlacker

The idea of being a horny guy online and content existing for horny guys online is regressive and shaming?

>>aprilt+(OP)
I think GP meant that stigmatizing the idea of a coomer is regressive and shaming, in that it's sex-negative -- if someone wants to masturbate excessively, there's nothing wrong with that, as long as it's not negatively impacting other aspects of their life. Not sure I agree with that take, but I think that's what they were talking about.

>>kelnos+0h
But there is something wrong with that. The excessive part. Thanks for clarifying

>>aprilt+HL
Do we have regressive and shaming names for excessive water drinkers? Excessive breathers? Excessive readers?

>>selcuk+xY
No, no, and yes.

There are few, if any, shuttering themselves away from regular social interactions due to an addiction to water or air.

The appearence of doing so because of a porn or more general book compulsion is more commonn.

>>defros+LZ
So what's the regressive and shaming name for excessive readers?

>>selcuk+Fy1
Aside from four eyed bookworm et al you mean?

>>selcuk+xY
Those aren't common things to be. We have regressive and shaming names for the excessively wealthy, the excessively macho, the excessively progressive, etc.

All things in moderation.