zlacker

>>walz+(OP)
The craziest thing to me is how...clean these results are. No nudity. No porn. No gore. Nothing overly sensitive. There is no doubt that so much of that stuff would have been initially uploaded but blocked by YouTube's filters. There are a million hours of video uploaded to the service every day, and they have built the infrastructure to analyze every single frame. When people ask why there are no viable competitors to YouTube – this is your answer.

>>paxys+94
Doubtful, it's likely just a game of numbers.

There is endless amounts of coomer content on YouTube like

  * Nude yoga
  * Body painting
  * Nude massages 
  * Transparent x haul / try on

You're just a million times more likely to get non-coomer content when it's been uploaded via iPhones upload to YouTube button during 2009-2014.

Heck, that was a time before onlyfans etc, so the primary coomer stuff on Reddit etc was produced by exhibitionists vs people just milking simps

>>ffsm8+v5
For those like me who had no idea what coomer means, it’s a weird meme about men that failed no nut November. It seems popular in alt-right circles.

>>rblatz+V7
Not sure where you're getting that alt-right circle from, it's just regular Internet lingo. Unless you consider people like Hasan alt-right too? Would be mind-blowing for sure, but hey, to reach their own.

Got popular during the pandemic, though it predates it

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Coomer

>>ffsm8+l9
The idea itself is so regressive and shaming, I don't find it surprising at all that the political right is drawn to it.

>>bertyl+4k
The idea of being a horny guy online and content existing for horny guys online is regressive and shaming?

>>aprilt+3U1
I think GP meant that stigmatizing the idea of a coomer is regressive and shaming, in that it's sex-negative -- if someone wants to masturbate excessively, there's nothing wrong with that, as long as it's not negatively impacting other aspects of their life. Not sure I agree with that take, but I think that's what they were talking about.

>>kelnos+3b2
But there is something wrong with that. The excessive part. Thanks for clarifying

>>aprilt+KF2
Do we have regressive and shaming names for excessive water drinkers? Excessive breathers? Excessive readers?

>>selcuk+AS2
No, no, and yes.

There are few, if any, shuttering themselves away from regular social interactions due to an addiction to water or air.

The appearence of doing so because of a porn or more general book compulsion is more commonn.

>>defros+OT2
So what's the regressive and shaming name for excessive readers?

>>selcuk+Is3
Aside from four eyed bookworm et al you mean?