zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. rchaud+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-10-02 13:54:52
> your new Kings are your domain registrar, registry operator and ultimately ICAN itself

To whom have these bodies caused problems, to anywhere near the same extent as mass market social media networks?

replies(2): >>append+l5 >>piyuv+A5
◧
2. append+l5[view] [source] 2024-10-02 14:31:08
>>rchaud+(OP)
Nobody said that this happened? The commenter is pointing out the faulty absolutist suggestion of the clickbait title.
◧
3. piyuv+A5[view] [source] 2024-10-02 14:32:29
>>rchaud+(OP)
OP is close to defending sovereign citizens.

Well-regulated, established organizations are not threats to liberty; on the contrary, they’re required for a well functioning community (of netizens)

Some kings thought that they were bound to gods so in the name of total freedom they announced themselves as “god-kings”

replies(2): >>int_19+vz >>Andrex+Eq3
◧◩
4. int_19+vz[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-10-02 17:21:34
>>piyuv+A5
It's not an either-or. Organizations are required for a well-functioning community, but they're also threats to liberty insofar as they represent easily capturable concentrations of power.
◧◩
5. Andrex+Eq3[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-10-03 19:10:48
>>piyuv+A5
I'm 33 and this is an argument I haven't considered, or have heard worded in such a way. Thank you for giving me a lot of food for thought the next few days.
[go to top]