zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. piyuv+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-10-02 14:32:29
OP is close to defending sovereign citizens.

Well-regulated, established organizations are not threats to liberty; on the contrary, they’re required for a well functioning community (of netizens)

Some kings thought that they were bound to gods so in the name of total freedom they announced themselves as “god-kings”

replies(2): >>int_19+Vt >>Andrex+4l3
◧
2. int_19+Vt[view] [source] 2024-10-02 17:21:34
>>piyuv+(OP)
It's not an either-or. Organizations are required for a well-functioning community, but they're also threats to liberty insofar as they represent easily capturable concentrations of power.
◧
3. Andrex+4l3[view] [source] 2024-10-03 19:10:48
>>piyuv+(OP)
I'm 33 and this is an argument I haven't considered, or have heard worded in such a way. Thank you for giving me a lot of food for thought the next few days.
[go to top]