zlacker

If someone posts a link to a gambling site on Facebook, should Facebook be banned?

>>LadyCa+(OP)
Facebook has to abide to the local laws.

>>LadyCa+(OP)
You probably don’t ban Facebook as a whole but if they fail to crack down on gambling links that violate advertising laws or allow gambling companies to advertise in spite of those laws they probably face heavy fines from regulators.

>>TimPC+K3
I think the issue he's raising is how you define advertising though. Is texting your friend a link advertising? What about posting a link on a forum? On Wikipedia? On your portfolio? On your footer? On your nav bar?

I think everyone agrees the name should not be damnatio memoriae nor should you be able to link to a click-wrapper, but people will always push the gray area in between as far as they can for that kind of money.

>>LadyCa+(OP)
If we're gonna play Reductio ad absurdum my question is, if someone whispers "online gambling" to a friend, should they be put to death?

>>mminer+hl
I think it's pretty easy to define, actually. Were they paid in some way to do those things? If yes, then it was advertising.

>>tcfunk+jb1
It sounds like the most common way to do these things is to have one company operate one gambling and one non-gambling site and just tell people they operate the other site on each. No money's changing hands, so that's not advertising. Then you can advertise to go to your non-gambling site, and they can organically navigate to the gambling site which was disclosed, not advertised. You would almost have to ban companies which have any interest in a gambling product from advertising anything at all.

>>mminer+Qs1
That sounds like a conspiracy and the penalties for conspiracy are much more severe than just illegal advertising.

>>Teever+2f2
Conspiracy to do what? Advertise? We already established it's not advertising.