zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. mminer+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-09-27 19:41:39
It sounds like the most common way to do these things is to have one company operate one gambling and one non-gambling site and just tell people they operate the other site on each. No money's changing hands, so that's not advertising. Then you can advertise to go to your non-gambling site, and they can organically navigate to the gambling site which was disclosed, not advertised. You would almost have to ban companies which have any interest in a gambling product from advertising anything at all.
replies(1): >>Teever+cM
2. Teever+cM[view] [source] 2024-09-28 03:57:00
>>mminer+(OP)
That sounds like a conspiracy and the penalties for conspiracy are much more severe than just illegal advertising.
replies(1): >>immibi+831
◧◩
3. immibi+831[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-09-28 08:27:28
>>Teever+cM
Conspiracy to do what? Advertise? We already established it's not advertising.
[go to top]