zlacker

It depends on the anti-compete clauses in his contract.

>>surfin+(OP)
Aren’t those non enforceable now?

>>surfin+(OP)
I don't know how to word it, but a company that ignores all content rights enforcing a non compete seems ironic to me.

>>surfin+(OP)
Not really a thing in CA, largely unenforceable.

>>meowti+j
Might still be enforceable at this level.

>>mhowla+y2
Thanks for pointing that out, I didn't know it. What about NDAs?

>>mtnGoa+z2
Hypothetically: Could someone play for both the Los Angeles Lakers and Golden State Warriors? Something tells me those non competes are unenforceable.

>>cellis+U9
Isnt those just branches of the same company?

>>rvba+7v
You can have contracts within a company.

>>rvba+7v
Now I'm curious how the NBA is structured. I always thought the "ownership" was who paid the players and signed the contracts (in essence, an NBA team is a company), and the NBA simply enforced the rules of the contracts (the "templating", if you will), but I'm sure it's much more complex than that. I made the analogy because NBA players often move from team to team and there are no non-competes keeping them from playing for another team.

>>cellis+Kr1
Maybe the NBA is a franchise and each team a franchisee?