zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. mtnGoa+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-15 05:17:22
Might still be enforceable at this level.
replies(1): >>cellis+l7
◧
2. cellis+l7[view] [source] 2024-05-15 06:39:30
>>mtnGoa+(OP)
Hypothetically: Could someone play for both the Los Angeles Lakers and Golden State Warriors? Something tells me those non competes are unenforceable.
replies(1): >>rvba+ys
◧◩
3. rvba+ys[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-15 10:30:47
>>cellis+l7
Isnt those just branches of the same company?
replies(2): >>Clarit+a31 >>cellis+bp1
◧◩◪
4. Clarit+a31[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-15 14:24:44
>>rvba+ys
You can have contracts within a company.
◧◩◪
5. cellis+bp1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-15 16:04:06
>>rvba+ys
Now I'm curious how the NBA is structured. I always thought the "ownership" was who paid the players and signed the contracts (in essence, an NBA team is a company), and the NBA simply enforced the rules of the contracts (the "templating", if you will), but I'm sure it's much more complex than that. I made the analogy because NBA players often move from team to team and there are no non-competes keeping them from playing for another team.
replies(1): >>meowti+gL2
◧◩◪◨
6. meowti+gL2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-16 00:25:08
>>cellis+bp1
Maybe the NBA is a franchise and each team a franchisee?
[go to top]