zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. cellis+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-15 06:39:30
Hypothetically: Could someone play for both the Los Angeles Lakers and Golden State Warriors? Something tells me those non competes are unenforceable.
replies(1): >>rvba+dl
◧
2. rvba+dl[view] [source] 2024-05-15 10:30:47
>>cellis+(OP)
Isnt those just branches of the same company?
replies(2): >>Clarit+PV >>cellis+Qh1
◧◩
3. Clarit+PV[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-15 14:24:44
>>rvba+dl
You can have contracts within a company.
◧◩
4. cellis+Qh1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-15 16:04:06
>>rvba+dl
Now I'm curious how the NBA is structured. I always thought the "ownership" was who paid the players and signed the contracts (in essence, an NBA team is a company), and the NBA simply enforced the rules of the contracts (the "templating", if you will), but I'm sure it's much more complex than that. I made the analogy because NBA players often move from team to team and there are no non-competes keeping them from playing for another team.
replies(1): >>meowti+VD2
◧◩◪
5. meowti+VD2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-16 00:25:08
>>cellis+Qh1
Maybe the NBA is a franchise and each team a franchisee?
[go to top]