> the community is heavily leaning into what might be termed the myth of marginalization
> this group, still upset about the failure of RFC 98, is using the myth of fascism
How can one take this document seriously after reading these sentences?
The picture that it paints about the actions of the people involved is accurate.
> Simultaneously, this group, still upset about the failure of RFC 98, is using the myth of fascism combined with an abusive extension of the paradox of tolerance (originally formulated by Karl Popper with a very different intent) to portray their opponents as bad-faith actors, or even as outright evil. They themselves, of course, do everything they can to appear justified in exercising power with absolutely no accountability, and with a clear sense of their own privileged entitlement to do so
No.
It just criticizes one group for pushing for a specific ideology and then starts pushing for it's own subjective ideology while championing itself as the "rational" and "neutral" position.