zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. buster+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-04-29 15:53:09
It's a bit skewed as far as the author's perspective, but so is everything. It's like reading the news. You have to filter past the bias and look at the facts.

The picture that it paints about the actions of the people involved is accurate.

replies(2): >>Pareto+z5 >>sorami+wd
2. Pareto+z5[view] [source] 2024-04-29 16:15:16
>>buster+(OP)
> The picture that it paints about the actions of the people involved is accurate.

No.

It just criticizes one group for pushing for a specific ideology and then starts pushing for it's own subjective ideology while championing itself as the "rational" and "neutral" position.

3. sorami+wd[view] [source] 2024-04-29 16:45:40
>>buster+(OP)
Yes, the right wing tone makes it cringy, but it does have a point. A vocal portion of the community is using far right scare to get off with abusive behavior. It's just another variation of the "think of the children" rhetoric. It's very effective at deflecting criticism because it associates critics with the most unsympathetic of people. The enemy of your enemy is not your friend.
[go to top]