zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. Pannon+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-04-29 15:59:08
The document uses support for its claims. Yup, the language is obviously quite emotional and biased, but the facts are correct nonetheless. Do you have any particular/specific issues with the issues raised in this RFC?^^
replies(1): >>Pareto+P3
2. Pareto+P3[view] [source] 2024-04-29 16:13:50
>>Pannon+(OP)
How is this claim supported:

> Simultaneously, this group, still upset about the failure of RFC 98, is using the myth of fascism combined with an abusive extension of the paradox of tolerance (originally formulated by Karl Popper with a very different intent) to portray their opponents as bad-faith actors, or even as outright evil. They themselves, of course, do everything they can to appear justified in exercising power with absolutely no accountability, and with a clear sense of their own privileged entitlement to do so

[go to top]