zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. tome+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-01-12 22:27:32
No one's provided evidence for the "destroyed hospital" that jcranmer claimed a "coterie of journalists" were invited to.
replies(1): >>johnny+uo
2. johnny+uo[view] [source] 2024-01-13 01:39:19
>>tome+(OP)
Then replace "destroyed" by "conducted a raid in", or even leave it out altogether, and nothing about the point of that sentence changes.
replies(1): >>tome+tO
◧◩
3. tome+tO[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-13 08:09:51
>>johnny+uo
Interesting. To me there's a very strong difference between destroying and not destroying a hospital.
replies(1): >>johnny+Zod
◧◩◪
4. johnny+Zod[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-17 11:53:32
>>tome+tO
Nope, the meaning is the exact same.

> I'm not going to try to enumerate Israel's mistakes, but when you decide to invite a coterie of journalists to the hospital you damaged to provide proof of your claims that it was actually a hive center of terrorist activity, and all of them come away basically saying "this evidence isn't good enough," then that should be a sign that it's not PR that's the problem of Israel, it's Israeli actions that are the problem that needs addressing.

replies(1): >>tome+ESe
◧◩◪◨
5. tome+ESe[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-17 19:25:55
>>johnny+Zod
Interesting! I'd definitely prefer that my hospital wasn't destroyed, just damaged. I guess others must feel differently.
[go to top]