zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. johnny+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-01-12 11:17:19
As far as you're aware. Okay? What am I supposed to do with that? 2 seconds of googling yielded this:

> According to the Palestinian Ministry of Health, 26 out of the 35 hospitals across Gaza are non-functional because of damage sustained during the Israeli military assault or the lack of power.

replies(2): >>beeboo+hI >>tome+L92
2. beeboo+hI[view] [source] 2024-01-12 15:48:01
>>johnny+(OP)
Israel isn't in Gaza at all. They're just on the borders playing with puppies. Hey, look over here. Puppies.
3. tome+L92[view] [source] 2024-01-12 22:27:32
>>johnny+(OP)
No one's provided evidence for the "destroyed hospital" that jcranmer claimed a "coterie of journalists" were invited to.
replies(1): >>johnny+fy2
◧◩
4. johnny+fy2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-13 01:39:19
>>tome+L92
Then replace "destroyed" by "conducted a raid in", or even leave it out altogether, and nothing about the point of that sentence changes.
replies(1): >>tome+eY2
◧◩◪
5. tome+eY2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-13 08:09:51
>>johnny+fy2
Interesting. To me there's a very strong difference between destroying and not destroying a hospital.
replies(1): >>johnny+Kyf
◧◩◪◨
6. johnny+Kyf[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-17 11:53:32
>>tome+eY2
Nope, the meaning is the exact same.

> I'm not going to try to enumerate Israel's mistakes, but when you decide to invite a coterie of journalists to the hospital you damaged to provide proof of your claims that it was actually a hive center of terrorist activity, and all of them come away basically saying "this evidence isn't good enough," then that should be a sign that it's not PR that's the problem of Israel, it's Israeli actions that are the problem that needs addressing.

replies(1): >>tome+p2h
◧◩◪◨⬒
7. tome+p2h[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-17 19:25:55
>>johnny+Kyf
Interesting! I'd definitely prefer that my hospital wasn't destroyed, just damaged. I guess others must feel differently.
[go to top]