zlacker

Yes and OpenAI sells its copies as a subscription, so that’s at least copyright infringement if not theft.

>>asylte+(OP)
They're not copies, no matter how much you want them to be.

>>anigbr+W5
They are copied. If I can say something like “make a picture of xyz in the style of Greg rutkowski” and it does so, then it’s a copy. It’s not analogous to a human because a human cannot reproduce things like a machine can. And if someone did copy someone artwork and try to sell it, then yes that would be theft. The logic doesn’t change just because it’s a machine doing it.

>>asylte+lR
Repeating what you want to be true doesn't make it so, in either technology or law.