zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. anigbr+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-12-27 19:25:01
They're not copies, no matter how much you want them to be.
replies(1): >>asylte+pL
2. asylte+pL[view] [source] 2023-12-28 00:13:48
>>anigbr+(OP)
They are copied. If I can say something like “make a picture of xyz in the style of Greg rutkowski” and it does so, then it’s a copy. It’s not analogous to a human because a human cannot reproduce things like a machine can. And if someone did copy someone artwork and try to sell it, then yes that would be theft. The logic doesn’t change just because it’s a machine doing it.
replies(1): >>anigbr+x21
◧◩
3. anigbr+x21[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-12-28 03:05:45
>>asylte+pL
Repeating what you want to be true doesn't make it so, in either technology or law.
[go to top]