zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. buggle+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-19 21:38:30
He’d probably be better off going to Meta or HuggingFace and working on getting open source as close to OpenAI’s offerings as possible. I expect that real innovation (vs. commercialization) is now fully dead at OpenAI, with them instead focusing on ROÍ for Microsoft.
replies(2): >>letmev+X5 >>imjons+M6
2. letmev+X5[view] [source] 2023-11-19 22:05:40
>>buggle+(OP)
Ilya is not a champion of open source: "We were wrong. Flat out, we were wrong. If you believe, as we do, that at some point, AI — AGI — is going to be extremely, unbelievably potent, then it just does not make sense to open-source. It is a bad idea... I fully expect that in a few years it’s going to be completely obvious to everyone that open-sourcing AI is just not wise."

https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/15/23640180/openai-gpt-4-lau...

replies(1): >>draken+Aq
3. imjons+M6[view] [source] 2023-11-19 22:09:37
>>buggle+(OP)
He's opposed to making powerful models open source, unfortunately.
◧◩
4. draken+Aq[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 23:58:41
>>letmev+X5
He said in an interview 2 weeks ago that below a certain capability threshold it is beneficial and good to open source models —- but once you cross that threshold it is a bad idea.

The example he gave is a model that could independently do science.

[go to top]