zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. crop_r+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:27:32
I think those are already posted 100 times on the main thread, and discussed in detail. None of that is new so can't be the reason for something like this.
replies(1): >>alchem+51
2. alchem+51[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:31:15
>>crop_r+(OP)
I understood it as there are additional and ongoing incidents and possible board was given hard evidence of such.
replies(1): >>magnet+8a
◧◩
3. magnet+8a[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 01:19:48
>>alchem+51
Are you willing to be more specific, or link to such a discussion?
replies(1): >>alchem+4j
◧◩◪
4. alchem+4j[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 02:15:10
>>magnet+8a
Not really. It’s all so torrid. More interesting would be anything that points to a different reason or evidence the action was related to professional misconduct not personal. The problem is all the suggestions so far are too dissimilar from when LLMs “hallucinate”
[go to top]