zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. alchem+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:31:15
I understood it as there are additional and ongoing incidents and possible board was given hard evidence of such.
replies(1): >>magnet+39
2. magnet+39[view] [source] 2023-11-18 01:19:48
>>alchem+(OP)
Are you willing to be more specific, or link to such a discussion?
replies(1): >>alchem+Zh
◧◩
3. alchem+Zh[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 02:15:10
>>magnet+39
Not really. It’s all so torrid. More interesting would be anything that points to a different reason or evidence the action was related to professional misconduct not personal. The problem is all the suggestions so far are too dissimilar from when LLMs “hallucinate”
[go to top]