zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. alchem+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:24:32
They related to his personal and familial life and are about as bad as it gets, well apart from murder and torture or something, but fairly close.
replies(2): >>crop_r+E >>runeva+d4
2. crop_r+E[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:27:32
>>alchem+(OP)
I think those are already posted 100 times on the main thread, and discussed in detail. None of that is new so can't be the reason for something like this.
replies(1): >>alchem+J1
◧◩
3. alchem+J1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 00:31:15
>>crop_r+E
I understood it as there are additional and ongoing incidents and possible board was given hard evidence of such.
replies(1): >>magnet+Ma
4. runeva+d4[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:43:01
>>alchem+(OP)
The wording of the letter from the board sounded like he was keeping company details from them to me, not personal matters. Maybe I'm wrong but that was the impression I was under reading it.
◧◩◪
5. magnet+Ma[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 01:19:48
>>alchem+J1
Are you willing to be more specific, or link to such a discussion?
replies(1): >>alchem+Ij
◧◩◪◨
6. alchem+Ij[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 02:15:10
>>magnet+Ma
Not really. It’s all so torrid. More interesting would be anything that points to a different reason or evidence the action was related to professional misconduct not personal. The problem is all the suggestions so far are too dissimilar from when LLMs “hallucinate”
[go to top]