zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. WarOnP+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-06-27 13:20:00
The lawsuit states that a number of people from different states are making the same accusation. That the trucks were utilized by Fedex for nearly 200k miles after the odometer swap is a worthwhile indicator that Fedex was complicit.
replies(1): >>sunk1s+92
2. sunk1s+92[view] [source] 2023-06-27 13:30:06
>>WarOnP+(OP)
If all sales were brokered by the same 3rd party then it doesn’t help us determine culpability.
replies(2): >>WarOnP+sQ >>ImPost+fo2
◧◩
3. WarOnP+sQ[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-27 16:54:30
>>sunk1s+92
This seems to ignore that FedEx drove their altered odometers to ~200k miles.
replies(1): >>delfin+uO1
◧◩◪
4. delfin+uO1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-27 22:02:31
>>WarOnP+sQ
The problem is, it's not illegal to alter your odometer and drive it yourself.

It is illegal not to report the odometer misreading in a sale. The real question is, who make the odometer change and where did the intentional or not breakdown happen on failure to report the odometer inaccuracy.

replies(1): >>WarOnP+Iy8
◧◩
5. ImPost+fo2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-28 02:16:10
>>sunk1s+92
"it's the 3rd party's fault" is an arguably plausible excuse, it's up to FedEx to make it convincing enough (proof etc) to excuse themselves
◧◩◪◨
6. WarOnP+Iy8[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-29 19:02:48
>>delfin+uO1
> The real question is, who make the odometer change

Better stated, I think, as who knew the odometers were changed out to zero reads, before the vehicles were then driven another ~200k miles.

Trying to craft a scenario where no one at FedEx had any knowledge at all that their well used vehicles suddenly had zero miles seems like low-return effort.

For an even better question, why undertake that specific project (at scale) except to perpetrate fraud?

[go to top]