zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
3 comments
1. Sed47_+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2023-02-08 19:38:57
I will definitely take a random substack blog more seriously. After all, he is citing "unnamed sources"! Very credible!
replies(1):
>>nivenk+97
◧
2. nivenk+97
[view]
[source]
2023-02-08 20:06:38
>>Sed47_+(OP)
It's not a random substack blog, it's one of the most famous journalists (a real one, no less!) in the world.
replies(1):
>>Sed47_+7V5
◧◩
3. Sed47_+7V5
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-02-10 06:45:24
>>nivenk+97
A one with a long history of talking bullshit with nothing to back it (other than "anonymous sources").
replies(1):
>>miguel+Dlp
◧◩◪
4. miguel+Dlp
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-02-15 21:50:39
>>Sed47_+7V5
Give us an example of when he was definitely wrong about something of substance. Not a minor detail, something that actually matters.
[go to top]