zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. miguel+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-02-08 18:59:08
Was this included for comic relief? Or did you actually think we should take the CIA or State Department PR seriously?
replies(2): >>jessau+55 >>Sed47_+Nb
◧
2. jessau+55[view] [source] 2023-02-08 19:15:42
>>miguel+(OP)
It's a fair question, but those quotes are in TFA.
◧
3. Sed47_+Nb[view] [source] 2023-02-08 19:38:57
>>miguel+(OP)
I will definitely take a random substack blog more seriously. After all, he is citing "unnamed sources"! Very credible!
replies(1): >>nivenk+Wi
◧◩
4. nivenk+Wi[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-02-08 20:06:38
>>Sed47_+Nb
It's not a random substack blog, it's one of the most famous journalists (a real one, no less!) in the world.
replies(1): >>Sed47_+U66
◧◩◪
5. Sed47_+U66[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-02-10 06:45:24
>>nivenk+Wi
A one with a long history of talking bullshit with nothing to back it (other than "anonymous sources").
replies(1): >>miguel+qxp
◧◩◪◨
6. miguel+qxp[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-02-15 21:50:39
>>Sed47_+U66
Give us an example of when he was definitely wrong about something of substance. Not a minor detail, something that actually matters.
[go to top]