zlacker

>>hungle+(OP)
>The White House on Wednesday dismissed a blog post by a U.S. investigative journalist alleging the United States was behind explosions of the Nord Stream gas pipelines as "utterly false and complete fiction."

>...

>"This is utterly false and complete fiction," said Adrienne Watson, a spokesperson for the White House National Security Council. Spokespeople for the CIA and State Department said the same.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/white-house-says-blog-post-...

>>r721+Kr1
Was this included for comic relief? Or did you actually think we should take the CIA or State Department PR seriously?

>>miguel+Xs1
I will definitely take a random substack blog more seriously. After all, he is citing "unnamed sources"! Very credible!

>>Sed47_+KE1
It's not a random substack blog, it's one of the most famous journalists (a real one, no less!) in the world.

>>nivenk+TL1
A one with a long history of talking bullshit with nothing to back it (other than "anonymous sources").

>>Sed47_+Rz7
Give us an example of when he was definitely wrong about something of substance. Not a minor detail, something that actually matters.