zlacker

What's really worrying to me is that he can change those DMs to say whatever suits his fancy, coupled with the fact nobody remaining at Twitter is in any position to blow the whistle on such conduct. It would likely remain secret indefinitely.

>>Lendal+(OP)
>What's really worrying to me is that he can change those DMs to say whatever suits his fancy,

I mean NSA has had this capability for 25 years.

>>Lendal+(OP)
I had not even considered that, good point, data integrity is not to be expected going forward. This also puts a rather interesting twist on any of the evidence presented.

>>jacque+11
Why was data integrity expected going backward?

>>hgfdhg+ts
In between there was a change of management. If you failed to notice that why are you commenting in this thread?

>>Retpol+n
Really? News to me. If NSA has had this secret ability, and if it is indeed a secret, how is it that some random person knows all about it and now feels perfectly safe revealing it on a public web site? Changing data in real time on private databases goes way beyond traffic monitoring & intelligence-gathering.