zlacker

>>GavCo+(OP)
There's an odd new risk for startups: someone buys your company and then releases all the internal documents with hostile intent. The Twitter stuff that's come out now has been pretty uninteresting, surprising and often basically telling a story of people doing the best job they could in difficult circumstances. But if you are at a small company consider what all could be acquired and used to defame your employees and mission.

>>Nelson+d01
The thing to really worry about is that someone like Musk has direct access to all of your DMs, including those of politicians the world over.

>>jacque+P01
What's really worrying to me is that he can change those DMs to say whatever suits his fancy, coupled with the fact nobody remaining at Twitter is in any position to blow the whistle on such conduct. It would likely remain secret indefinitely.

>>Lendal+d51
I had not even considered that, good point, data integrity is not to be expected going forward. This also puts a rather interesting twist on any of the evidence presented.

>>jacque+e61
Why was data integrity expected going backward?