zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
2 comments
1. jacque+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2022-12-17 04:59:38
I had not even considered that, good point, data integrity is not to be expected going forward. This also puts a rather interesting twist on any of the evidence presented.
replies(1):
>>hgfdhg+sr
◧
2. hgfdhg+sr
[view]
[source]
2022-12-17 10:28:51
>>jacque+(OP)
Why was data integrity expected going backward?
replies(1):
>>jacque+S51
◧◩
3. jacque+S51
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2022-12-17 16:18:42
>>hgfdhg+sr
In between there was a change of management. If you failed to notice that why are you commenting in this thread?
[go to top]