zlacker

Because leftists often use that as an example of hate speech.

>>simple+(OP)
And rightly so.

>>jacque+62
Depends on the context. People have been suspended from Twitter from saying things like "transwomen are actually men so stop letting them compete in women's sports, it's not safe or fair for actual women", which isn't hate speech, doesn't target an individual, and is a legitimate political opinion, so in theory should be fine. Yet bans are handed out anyway.

>>ciler+Z7
I’m not familiar with the lightness with which Twitter bans conservatives. Could you provide an example close to the example you gave? Or will any example be even more bigoted?

>>ciler+Z7
I don't believe that. I know several conservatives who posted that shit all the time and didn't get banned.

>>jacque+62
Stating facts is not hate speech -- especially if you're trying to force society to go along with your unreality for political reasons.

>>roflye+j51
So Twitter needs to bad them all for you to be convinced?

>>simple+2V1
Stating facts can be hate speech. For example, if someone said "I was just attacked on my way home" and someone said "you're black" in response, yeah. Facts. Hate speech.

See? :)

>>simple+dV1
No. I just don't believe there is a "ban this speech" b/c in my experience that didn't happen.

>>roflye+fE2
Wait, so how is that hate speech?