zlacker

>>GavCo+(OP)
Learned basically nothing here. So the FBI helped Twitter with content moderation? Who gives a crap.

>>leoh+eM
They were going after political speech while ignoring actual crimes.

>>kodyo+yN
Oh please. Link to where Twitter banned someone for being right wing. Hate speech doesn't count.

>>wesley+lO
It's very convenient that one side of the asile is always in a position to define what hate speech is.

Neat trick, but it doesn't work anymore.

>>simple+eP
Not a trick, but yeah saying we should harm certain groups of people is hate speech.

>>roflye+HQ
Who is saying that people should be harmed? Seriously. Whoever you have in mind, if they're actually advocating violence against people then I'm in agreement with you. That's not cool and they shouldn't be doing that.

Are you referring to calling a trans person by their biological sex?

>>simple+SR
Why does your mind instinctively go to that example?

>>Apocry+HV
Because leftists often use that as an example of hate speech.

>>simple+iY
And rightly so.

>>jacque+o01
Depends on the context. People have been suspended from Twitter from saying things like "transwomen are actually men so stop letting them compete in women's sports, it's not safe or fair for actual women", which isn't hate speech, doesn't target an individual, and is a legitimate political opinion, so in theory should be fine. Yet bans are handed out anyway.

>>ciler+h61
I don't believe that. I know several conservatives who posted that shit all the time and didn't get banned.