zlacker

>>GavCo+(OP)
Learned basically nothing here. So the FBI helped Twitter with content moderation? Who gives a crap.

>>leoh+eM
They were going after political speech while ignoring actual crimes.

>>kodyo+yN
Oh please. Link to where Twitter banned someone for being right wing. Hate speech doesn't count.

>>wesley+lO
It's very convenient that one side of the asile is always in a position to define what hate speech is.

Neat trick, but it doesn't work anymore.

>>simple+eP
Not a trick, but yeah saying we should harm certain groups of people is hate speech.

>>roflye+HQ
Who is saying that people should be harmed? Seriously. Whoever you have in mind, if they're actually advocating violence against people then I'm in agreement with you. That's not cool and they shouldn't be doing that.

Are you referring to calling a trans person by their biological sex?

>>simple+SR
Why does your mind instinctively go to that example?

>>Apocry+HV
Because leftists often use that as an example of hate speech.

>>simple+iY
And rightly so.

>>jacque+o01
Stating facts is not hate speech -- especially if you're trying to force society to go along with your unreality for political reasons.

>>simple+kT2
Stating facts can be hate speech. For example, if someone said "I was just attacked on my way home" and someone said "you're black" in response, yeah. Facts. Hate speech.

See? :)

>>roflye+xC3
Wait, so how is that hate speech?