zlacker

The journos were doxxing his location. See pretty unethical on their part, if proven true.

>>thwoei+(OP)
No, they weren't. They linked to Facebook and Mastodon pages that aggregated publicly available data about where his PLANE went.

>>thwoei+(OP)
The journalist were linking to an aggregator* of public FAA data of a jet that Elon may or may not be on… not “his location”

*granted he had to do a tiny bit of work to counter the insufficient obfuscation the FAA allows for privacy.

>>thwoei+(OP)
You mean the FAA was doxxing him?

>>gcbirz+S
…information that had previously gotten an account banned for doxxing.

They thumbed their nose at a rule, got banned, and then cried about it.

What am I supposed to care about, exactly?

>>thwoei+(OP)
they were doxxing his location about as my as my reply is doxxing yours.

what a joker.

>>zmgsab+73
Given that the rule didn’t exist when Elon originally banned @ElonJet?

I’d suggest that you care about the fact that Elon will ban anyone he wants banned, and make up a justification post-facto. If you don’t care who gets banned from Twitter, then I retract my suggestion.

>>thwoei+(OP)
Elon is pulling the wool to incite his mob. He states people are doxxing his real-time location. The only people he’s banning are those that reference publicly available FAA flight data. I even think the owner of the Twitter account put the tweet on a time delay. Far from the truth.