zlacker

>>prawn+(OP)
It remains very funny that he paid forty-five billion dollars for the privilege of humiliating himself daily with these petulant temper-tantrums. Amazing bit.

>>browse+B6
If you go out just a little bit not everyone hates him. Personally I think he hasn’t don’t anything overt yet. So he banned a few journalists, do you know why? No right? So why judge so early?

>>m3kw9+2c
The journos were doxxing his location. See pretty unethical on their part, if proven true.

>>thwoei+ge
No, they weren't. They linked to Facebook and Mastodon pages that aggregated publicly available data about where his PLANE went.

>>gcbirz+8f
…information that had previously gotten an account banned for doxxing.

They thumbed their nose at a rule, got banned, and then cried about it.

What am I supposed to care about, exactly?

>>zmgsab+nh
Given that the rule didn’t exist when Elon originally banned @ElonJet?

I’d suggest that you care about the fact that Elon will ban anyone he wants banned, and make up a justification post-facto. If you don’t care who gets banned from Twitter, then I retract my suggestion.